Her resignation highlights the growing divide among Canadian Jews regarding Israel and its policies towards Palestine
Selina Robinson, the former British Columbia Minister of Higher Education in the NDP government, resigned from her post due to public pressure after making demeaning comments about pre-colonial Palestine by calling it “a crappy piece of land with nothing on it.”
University of British Columbia professor and member of the Jewish Faculty Association, Avi Lewis, stated, “This is, I believe, the first time in North American political history when a senior member of government has paid the ultimate political price for anti-Palestinian racism. …There are already too many people who have been losing their jobs (in post-secondary education) because of opinions that they hold publicly, though so far, that’s almost exclusively been for expressing solidarity with Palestinians, who, once again, are being killed indiscriminately.”
Those who support Robinson point out that she apologized for this most recent comment and even agreed to sensitivity training concerning anti-Islamic racism. The problem is that this was only the latest in a series of objectionable statements and abuses of her influence as a government minister.
Independent Jewish Voices has been tracking Robinson’s racist comments on social media for months and has been calling on Premier David Eby to take action. Robinson was given ample time to receive sensitivity training and to bring her views more in line with the growing number of Canadians who recognize Canada’s complicity in the crimes being committed in Gaza.
Most mainstream media reports on Robinson’s resignation also ignore a very important aspect of this story: Robinson had been abusing her political power to threaten academic freedom and freedom of expression in Canada.
The Federation of Post-Secondary Educators of BC and the Canadian Association of University Teachers both called for the immediate resignation of Robinson, not because of her “crappy piece of land” comment, but because “Minister Robinson inappropriately intervened in the termination of a Langara College employee for controversial remarks on the war in Gaza. “
The employee, Natalie Knight, had described the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel as “amazing, brilliant” at a public rally in October.
Knight had been placed on leave for her statement but was cleared of wrongdoing by the College’s Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression Advisory Committee and allowed to return to work. The following day, Robinson spoke with Langara College officials, and she was terminated. We know this because Robinson made posts about her intervention on social media.
Ultimately, this is why Selena Robinson had to resign. Her statements about Palestine and Palestinians that became viral over the next several days were simply the final nail that Robinson placed in her own political coffin.
What is the larger significance of the Selina Robinson saga? First, it completely disproves the vile antisemitic trope that all Jews function as a monolith. There are many Jews like Robinson who will support the State of Israel without question and continue to perpetuate the myth that before colonization, this was “a land without a people for a people without a land.” There are also many Jews with views like Avi Lewis. If membership numbers in groups like Independent Jewish Voices are any indication, we can conclude that the number of people in this group is growing at an unprecedented rate.
A few months ago, no one would have even noticed if a member of a government made a demeaning remark toward Palestinians. The world has drastically changed since Israel began its latest assault on Gaza. The vast majority of Canadians will not support a government that they see as anti-democratic, racist, and even pro-genocide.
Do the members of our government have the capacity to hear the righteous rage of their constituents and change course? Or have they already condemned themselves to the same fate as Selina Robinson?
Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He is the recipient of an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.
For interview requests, click here.
The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.
© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.
Thanks for this succinct and very clear explanation of what went on with the Selena Robinson-Natalie Knight persecution. Also, thanks for the background on Robinson’s lengthy history of anti-Palestinian racism. Too bad Premier Eby had to be forced to can her after such a lengthy period Too bad also that the former premier, Horgan, a disgraceful friend of Big Oil and Gas and a foe of First Nations rights made a public declaration that the BC NDP supports the anti-Palestinian IHRA definition of antisemitism even though the Party had done no such thing.
Gerry:
I am writing to you on behalf of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East to thank you for a recent article titled “The Selina Robinson saga is a lesson in political accountability,” published on February 16 by Kirkland Lake Voice.
After Robinson had made her racist comments about Palestine, we noticed a lot of media coverage that referred to Robinson’s comments as being about “the land on which Israel was founded.” This is an obvious case of anti-Palestinian racism, as it erases the existence of Palestine before the Nakba. In your article, however, you refer to Robinson’s “demeaning comments about pre-colonial Palestine.” Thank you for referring to Palestine.
Another component we urged journalists to include in their reporting of Selina Robinson was a clear explanation of how and why her comments were particularly racist and harmful. As we both know, her claim that the land was “crappy” and “had nothing on it” perpetuates a key feature of Zionist political discourse: the claim that Palestine was a “land without a People for a People without a Land” and, therefore, ideal for the creation of the state of Israel. Thank you for including this information in your article, for it further contextualizes Robinson’s comments as a form of anti-Palestinian racism.
This article was thoughtful, well-researched, and, most importantly, showed a prioritization of pro-Palestinian perspectives, all of which contribute to good journalism. Please continue to do so.
Sincerely,
Rose Mardikian,
Media Analyst, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East
Thank you very much for your well thought reflections on Palestine and Israel! I wish that Jerusalem, since it is holy to three major religions, could become an international state! Perhaps under the United Nations! I don’t understand those who cannot see the residents of Gaza as their neighbours and fellow human beings!
We should be reminded that the Story of the Good Samaritan tells us that EVERYONE is our neighbour! Too few who know the story understand why Jesus Christ called the person who came to the rescue of the ignored victim of a violent robbery a Samaritan!
To my fellow readers, if you don’t know why, please find out!
Thanks for this succinct and very clear explanation of what went on with the Selena Robinson-Natalie Knight persecution. Also, thanks for the background on Robinson’s lengthy history of anti-Palestinian racism. Too bad Premier Eby had to be forced to can her after such a lengthy period Too bad also that the former premier, Horgan, a disgraceful friend of Big Oil and Gas and a foe of First Nations rights made a public declaration that the BC NDP supports the anti-Palestinian IHRA definition of antisemitism even though the Party had done no such thing.
Gerry:
I am writing to you on behalf of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East to thank you for a recent article titled “The Selina Robinson saga is a lesson in political accountability,” published on February 16 by Kirkland Lake Voice.
After Robinson had made her racist comments about Palestine, we noticed a lot of media coverage that referred to Robinson’s comments as being about “the land on which Israel was founded.” This is an obvious case of anti-Palestinian racism, as it erases the existence of Palestine before the Nakba. In your article, however, you refer to Robinson’s “demeaning comments about pre-colonial Palestine.” Thank you for referring to Palestine.
Another component we urged journalists to include in their reporting of Selina Robinson was a clear explanation of how and why her comments were particularly racist and harmful. As we both know, her claim that the land was “crappy” and “had nothing on it” perpetuates a key feature of Zionist political discourse: the claim that Palestine was a “land without a People for a People without a Land” and, therefore, ideal for the creation of the state of Israel. Thank you for including this information in your article, for it further contextualizes Robinson’s comments as a form of anti-Palestinian racism.
This article was thoughtful, well-researched, and, most importantly, showed a prioritization of pro-Palestinian perspectives, all of which contribute to good journalism. Please continue to do so.
Sincerely,